Match statistics snapshot
- Casa Pia created the clearer chances on xG (0.48 vs 1.19, Δ 0.71).
- Famalicao fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Casa Pia was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 0.48 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.19Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 391Lead | Accurate passes | 286 |
| 448Lead | Total passes | 353 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.44 | Goals prevented | -0.44 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |