Match statistics snapshot
- Famalicao created the clearer chances on xG (1.22 vs 0.25, Δ 0.97).
- Famalicao fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Farense was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.22Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.25 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 74%Lead | Ball possession | 26% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 470Lead | Accurate passes | 127 |
| 546Lead | Total passes | 194 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.21 | Goals prevented | -0.21 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Farense |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |