Match statistics snapshot
- Portimonense created the clearer chances on xG (1.64 vs 2.11, Δ 0.47).
- Famalicao fired more attempts (18 vs 16 shots).
- Portimonense was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Portimonense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.64 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.11Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Portimonense |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 248 | Accurate passes | 285Lead |
| 319 | Total passes | 357Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Portimonense |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Portimonense |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Portimonense |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.