Match statistics snapshot
- Famalicao created the clearer chances on xG (2.49 vs 0.62, Δ 1.87).
- Famalicao fired more attempts (28 vs 5 shots).
- Rio Ave was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 2.49Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.62 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 19Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 28Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 403Lead | Accurate passes | 277 |
| 484Lead | Total passes | 353 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.27 | Goals prevented | 1.27 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.