Match statistics snapshot
- FAR Rabat created the clearer chances on xG (2.82 vs 0.42, Δ 2.40).
- FAR Rabat fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- Mamelodi Sundowns was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Far Rabat | Statistic | Mamelodi Sundowns |
|---|---|---|
| 2.82Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.42 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Far Rabat | Statistic | Mamelodi Sundowns |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 275Lead | Accurate passes | 274 |
| 352 | Total passes | 362Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Far Rabat | Statistic | Mamelodi Sundowns |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Far Rabat | Statistic | Mamelodi Sundowns |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.93 | Goals prevented | 0.93 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Far Rabat | Statistic | Mamelodi Sundowns |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.