Match statistics snapshot
- FAR Rabat created the clearer chances on xG (0.80 vs 0.12, Δ 0.68).
- FAR Rabat fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- FAR Rabat was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Far Rabat | Statistic | Renaissance Berkane |
|---|---|---|
| 0.80Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.12 |
| 6 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Far Rabat | Statistic | Renaissance Berkane |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 387Lead | Accurate passes | 356 |
| 442Lead | Total passes | 435 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Far Rabat | Statistic | Renaissance Berkane |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Far Rabat | Statistic | Renaissance Berkane |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.04 | Goals prevented | -0.04 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Far Rabat | Statistic | Renaissance Berkane |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.