Match statistics snapshot
- Casa Pia created the clearer chances on xG (0.28 vs 1.75, Δ 1.47).
- Casa Pia fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Casa Pia was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farense | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 0.28 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.75Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farense | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 342Lead | Accurate passes | 260 |
| 415Lead | Total passes | 341 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farense | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farense | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farense | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.