Match statistics snapshot
- Farense created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 0.63, Δ 0.48).
- Farense fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Farense was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farense | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.63 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farense | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 331Lead | Accurate passes | 299 |
| 404Lead | Total passes | 389 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farense | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farense | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farense | Statistic | Estoril |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |