Match statistics snapshot
- Farense created the clearer chances on xG (1.54 vs 1.00, Δ 0.54).
- Farense fired more attempts (21 vs 17 shots).
- Farense was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farense | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 1.54Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.00 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 8 | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farense | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 251 | Accurate passes | 319Lead |
| 344 | Total passes | 401Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farense | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farense | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farense | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |