Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (0.47 vs 1.31, Δ 0.84).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- FC Porto held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farense | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 0.47 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.31Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farense | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 195 | Accurate passes | 437Lead |
| 255 | Total passes | 512Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farense | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farense | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.28 | Goals prevented | 0.28 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farense | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |