Match statistics snapshot
- Farense created the clearer chances on xG (1.30 vs 1.15, Δ 0.15).
- Rio Ave fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Farense was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farense | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 1.30Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.15 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farense | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 238 | Accurate passes | 435Lead |
| 326 | Total passes | 522Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farense | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farense | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farense | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.