Match statistics snapshot
- Farul Constanta created the clearer chances on xG (2.74 vs 2.02, Δ 0.72).
- Farul Constanta fired more attempts (20 vs 17 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 2.74Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.02 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 353Lead | Accurate passes | 350 |
| 445Lead | Total passes | 440 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Cfr 1907 Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |