Match statistics snapshot
- Farul Constanta fired more attempts (32 vs 3 shots).
- Chindia Targoviste was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 31%).
- Farul Constanta held more of the ball (75% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Chindia Targoviste |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 18 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 32Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Chindia Targoviste |
|---|---|---|
| 75%Lead | Ball possession | 25% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Chindia Targoviste |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Chindia Targoviste |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Chindia Targoviste |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |