Match statistics snapshot
- Farul Constanta created the clearer chances on xG (2.41 vs 0.63, Δ 1.78).
- Farul Constanta was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 27%).
- Farul Constanta held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Csikszereda |
|---|---|---|
| 2.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.63 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Csikszereda |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 430Lead | Accurate passes | 260 |
| 510Lead | Total passes | 337 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Csikszereda |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Csikszereda |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Csikszereda |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.