Match statistics snapshot
- Farul Constanta created the clearer chances on xG (1.97 vs 0.97, Δ 1.00).
- Farul Constanta fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Dinamo Bucuresti was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 1.97Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.97 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 340Lead | Accurate passes | 328 |
| 440 | Total passes | 440 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.