Match statistics snapshot
- Dinamo Bucuresti created the clearer chances on xG (1.95 vs 2.98, Δ 1.03).
- Dinamo Bucuresti fired more attempts (23 vs 9 shots).
- Farul Constanta was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 1.95 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.98Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 193 | Accurate passes | 396Lead |
| 308 | Total passes | 495Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Dinamo Bucuresti |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.