Match statistics snapshot
- Farul Constanta fired more attempts (20 vs 8 shots).
- FC Botosani was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 5%).
- Farul Constanta held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 59% |
| 425Lead | Accurate passes | 150 |
| 525Lead | Total passes | 255 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Fc Botosani |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.