Match statistics snapshot
- Farul Constanta created the clearer chances on xG (2.05 vs 1.86, Δ 0.19).
- Farul Constanta fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- FCSB was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 2.05Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.86 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 338Lead | Accurate passes | 269 |
| 445Lead | Total passes | 384 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Fcsb |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.