Match statistics snapshot
- Farul Constanta created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 0.56, Δ 0.55).
- Oţelul fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- Farul Constanta was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.56 |
| 7 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 71%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 268 | Accurate passes | 270Lead |
| 375 | Total passes | 397Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.