Match statistics snapshot
- Oţelul created the clearer chances on xG (0.80 vs 2.66, Δ 1.86).
- Oţelul fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 0.80 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.66Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 73%Lead |
| 265Lead | Accurate passes | 257 |
| 366Lead | Total passes | 354 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |