Match statistics snapshot
- Farul Constanta was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Politehnica Iasi |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Politehnica Iasi |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 71%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 302Lead | Accurate passes | 273 |
| 424Lead | Total passes | 406 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Politehnica Iasi |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Politehnica Iasi |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Politehnica Iasi |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.