Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (1.87 vs 1.91, Δ 0.04).
- Farul Constanta fired more attempts (18 vs 13 shots).
- Rapid was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 1.87 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.91Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 426Lead | Accurate passes | 277 |
| 504Lead | Total passes | 365 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.