Match statistics snapshot
- Farul Constanta created the clearer chances on xG (2.71 vs 0.60, Δ 2.11).
- Farul Constanta fired more attempts (22 vs 11 shots).
- Farul Constanta was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | U Craiova 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.71Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.60 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 7 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | U Craiova 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 206 | Accurate passes | 440Lead |
| 294 | Total passes | 508Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | U Craiova 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | U Craiova 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 10Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | U Craiova 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.