Match statistics snapshot
- Universitatea Cluj created the clearer chances on xG (1.08 vs 1.42, Δ 0.34).
- Farul Constanta fired more attempts (25 vs 10 shots).
- Universitatea Cluj was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 1.08 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.42Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 413Lead | Accurate passes | 205 |
| 502Lead | Total passes | 296 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.