Match statistics snapshot
- Farul Constanta created the clearer chances on xG (1.44 vs 1.17, Δ 0.27).
- Farul Constanta fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Farul Constanta was more accurate in front of goal (62% on target vs 44%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Universitatea Craiova |
|---|---|---|
| 1.44Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Universitatea Craiova |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 260 | Accurate passes | 405Lead |
| 343 | Total passes | 490Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Universitatea Craiova |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Universitatea Craiova |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Universitatea Craiova |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |