Match statistics snapshot
- Farul Constanta created the clearer chances on xG (4.82 vs 3.38, Δ 1.44).
- Farul Constanta fired more attempts (23 vs 17 shots).
- Farul Constanta was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Universitatea Craiova |
|---|---|---|
| 4.82Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 3.38 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Universitatea Craiova |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 362 | Accurate passes | 403Lead |
| 447 | Total passes | 481Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Universitatea Craiova |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Universitatea Craiova |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Farul Constanta | Statistic | Universitatea Craiova |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.