Match statistics snapshot
- Fatih Karagümrük fired more attempts (13 vs 2 shots).
- Amed was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fatih Karagümrük | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 6Lead |
| 1 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fatih Karagümrük | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 325 | Accurate passes | 346Lead |
| 406 | Total passes | 434Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fatih Karagümrük | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fatih Karagümrük | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fatih Karagümrük | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.