Match statistics snapshot
- Fatih Karagümrük created the clearer chances on xG (1.57 vs 0.21, Δ 1.36).
- Fatih Karagümrük fired more attempts (17 vs 5 shots).
- Rizespor was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fatih Karagümrük | Statistic | Rizespor |
|---|---|---|
| 1.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.21 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fatih Karagümrük | Statistic | Rizespor |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 380Lead | Accurate passes | 294 |
| 455Lead | Total passes | 368 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fatih Karagümrük | Statistic | Rizespor |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fatih Karagümrük | Statistic | Rizespor |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fatih Karagümrük | Statistic | Rizespor |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |