Match statistics snapshot
- Ümraniyespor fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Fatih Karagümrük was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 8%).
- Fatih Karagümrük held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fatih Karagümrük | Statistic | Ümraniyespor |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fatih Karagümrük | Statistic | Ümraniyespor |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 357Lead | Accurate passes | 266 |
| 455Lead | Total passes | 368 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fatih Karagümrük | Statistic | Ümraniyespor |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fatih Karagümrük | Statistic | Ümraniyespor |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fatih Karagümrük | Statistic | Ümraniyespor |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |