Match statistics snapshot
- FBC Melgar created the clearer chances on xG (1.53 vs 0.95, Δ 0.58).
- Cienciano fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- FBC Melgar was more accurate in front of goal (70% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fbc Melgar | Statistic | Cienciano |
|---|---|---|
| 1.53Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.95 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fbc Melgar | Statistic | Cienciano |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 274 | Accurate passes | 326Lead |
| 365 | Total passes | 418Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fbc Melgar | Statistic | Cienciano |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fbc Melgar | Statistic | Cienciano |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fbc Melgar | Statistic | Cienciano |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.