Match statistics snapshot
- Cusco created the clearer chances on xG (1.50 vs 1.54, Δ 0.04).
- FBC Melgar fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Cusco was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fbc Melgar | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.54Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fbc Melgar | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 493Lead | Accurate passes | 265 |
| 553Lead | Total passes | 329 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fbc Melgar | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fbc Melgar | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fbc Melgar | Statistic | Cusco |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.