Match statistics snapshot
- UTC Cajamarca created the clearer chances on xG (2.01 vs 2.13, Δ 0.12).
- FBC Melgar fired more attempts (20 vs 10 shots).
- FBC Melgar held more of the ball (75% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fbc Melgar | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 2.01 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.13Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fbc Melgar | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 75%Lead | Ball possession | 25% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 52% |
| 432Lead | Accurate passes | 87 |
| 513Lead | Total passes | 168 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fbc Melgar | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fbc Melgar | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fbc Melgar | Statistic | Utc Cajamarca |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.