Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (0.27 vs 1.52, Δ 1.25).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (24 vs 6 shots).
- Chelsea held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Astana | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 0.27 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.52Lead |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 13Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Astana | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 93%Lead |
| 226 | Accurate passes | 631Lead |
| 292 | Total passes | 682Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Astana | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Astana | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.50 | Goals prevented | -0.50 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Astana | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.