Match statistics snapshot
- Plzen created the clearer chances on xG (0.37 vs 1.01, Δ 0.64).
- Plzen fired more attempts (12 vs 6 shots).
- FC Astana was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Astana | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 0.37 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.01Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Astana | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 290 | Accurate passes | 316Lead |
| 387 | Total passes | 427Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Astana | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Astana | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Astana | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.