Match statistics snapshot
- FC Augsburg created the clearer chances on xG (0.54 vs 0.38, Δ 0.16).
- FC Augsburg fired more attempts (7 vs 6 shots).
- FC Augsburg was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Augsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 0.54Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.38 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Augsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 350Lead | Accurate passes | 202 |
| 479Lead | Total passes | 331 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Augsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Augsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Augsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.