Match statistics snapshot
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim created the clearer chances on xG (1.09 vs 1.17, Δ 0.08).
- FC Augsburg was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 55%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Augsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 1.09 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Augsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 489Lead | Accurate passes | 297 |
| 577Lead | Total passes | 372 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Augsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Augsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| 0.13 | Goals prevented | 0.13 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Augsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.