Match statistics snapshot
- FC Augsburg created the clearer chances on xG (1.94 vs 1.09, Δ 0.85).
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Augsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 1.94Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.09 |
| Offsides | ||
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6 |
| 6 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Augsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 359 | Accurate passes | 385Lead |
| 459 | Total passes | 470Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Augsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Augsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.77 | Goals prevented | 0.77 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Augsburg | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |