Match statistics snapshot
- Farul Constanta created the clearer chances on xG (1.81 vs 2.14, Δ 0.33).
- FC Botosani fired more attempts (25 vs 14 shots).
- Farul Constanta was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 28%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 1.81 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.14Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 379Lead | Accurate passes | 291 |
| 464Lead | Total passes | 379 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Farul Constanta |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.