Match statistics snapshot
- FC Botosani created the clearer chances on xG (0.72 vs 0.29, Δ 0.43).
- FC Botosani fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- FC Botosani was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 0.72Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.29 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 270Lead | Accurate passes | 172 |
| 370Lead | Total passes | 280 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Oţelul |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.