Match statistics snapshot
- FC Botosani created the clearer chances on xG (1.62 vs 0.51, Δ 1.11).
- FC Botosani fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Rapid was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 1.62Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.51 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 160 | Accurate passes | 365Lead |
| 239 | Total passes | 445Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |