Match statistics snapshot
- FC Botosani created the clearer chances on xG (1.70 vs 0.78, Δ 0.92).
- FC Botosani fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
- Rapid held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 1.70Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.78 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 265 | Accurate passes | 421Lead |
| 367 | Total passes | 523Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |