Match statistics snapshot
- Rapid created the clearer chances on xG (0.63 vs 0.95, Δ 0.32).
- FC Botosani fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- FC Botosani was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 0.63 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.95Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 280Lead | Accurate passes | 253 |
| 373Lead | Total passes | 339 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Rapid |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.