Match statistics snapshot
- Universitatea Cluj created the clearer chances on xG (0.54 vs 1.19, Δ 0.65).
- FC Botosani fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Universitatea Cluj was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 0.54 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.19Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 312 | Accurate passes | 315Lead |
| 402 | Total passes | 410Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.