Match statistics snapshot
- Universitatea Cluj created the clearer chances on xG (0.37 vs 1.42, Δ 1.05).
- Universitatea Cluj fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- Universitatea Cluj was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 0.37 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.42Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 167 | Accurate passes | 501Lead |
| 257 | Total passes | 583Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Universitatea Cluj |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |