Match statistics snapshot
- FC Botosani created the clearer chances on xG (3.16 vs 1.17, Δ 1.99).
- FC Botosani fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
- Uta Arad held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Uta Arad |
|---|---|---|
| 3.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Uta Arad |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 61% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 134 | Accurate passes | 409Lead |
| 220 | Total passes | 505Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Uta Arad |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Uta Arad |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Botosani | Statistic | Uta Arad |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |