Match statistics snapshot
- Wolfsberger AC fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Wolfsberger AC was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 21%).
- FC BW Linz held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Bw Linz | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Bw Linz | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 62% |
| 409Lead | Accurate passes | 207 |
| 550Lead | Total passes | 335 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Bw Linz | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Bw Linz | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Bw Linz | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |