Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cartagena fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Eldense was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 17%).
- FC Cartagena held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cartagena | Statistic | Eldense |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cartagena | Statistic | Eldense |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 359Lead | Accurate passes | 281 |
| 436Lead | Total passes | 353 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cartagena | Statistic | Eldense |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cartagena | Statistic | Eldense |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cartagena | Statistic | Eldense |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |