Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 0.48, Δ 0.63).
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.48 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 379Lead | Accurate passes | 371 |
| 450 | Total passes | 459Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |