Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- Atlas was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 41%).
- FC Cincinnati held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 447Lead | Accurate passes | 348 |
| 532Lead | Total passes | 440 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.