Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (34 vs 2 shots).
- Cavalier was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 41%).
- FC Cincinnati held more of the ball (73% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cavalier |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 21Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| 12 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 14Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 34Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cavalier |
|---|---|---|
| 73%Lead | Ball possession | 27% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 646Lead | Accurate passes | 183 |
| 721Lead | Total passes | 261 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cavalier |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cavalier |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 10Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fc Cincinnati | Statistic | Cavalier |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 3Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.